|
課程名稱 |
原住民與博物館：變動的觀念、關係與實作
Indigenous Peoples and Museums: Changing Concepts, Relationships and Practices |
|
開課學期 |
108-1 |
|
授課對象 |
文學院 人類學系 |
|
授課教師 |
童元昭 |
|
課號 |
Anth5122 |
|
課程識別碼 |
125 U3150 |
|
班次 |
|
|
學分 |
3.0 |
|
全/半年 |
半年 |
|
必/選修 |
選修 |
|
上課時間 |
星期三7,8,9(14:20~17:20) |
|
上課地點 |
水源人105 |
|
備註 |
限學士班三年級以上
總人數上限：15人 |
|
Ceiba 課程網頁 |
http://ceiba.ntu.edu.tw/1081Anth5122_museum |
|
課程簡介影片 |
|
|
核心能力關聯 |
核心能力與課程規劃關聯圖 |
|
課程大綱
|
|
為確保您我的權利,請尊重智慧財產權及不得非法影印
|
|
課程概述 |
一般來說，博物館是一個受歡迎的學習場所，但涉及原住民人體遺骸或物件典藏的民族學或綜合性的博物館，則在全球原住民族意識漸強的時代面臨諸多批判挑戰。博物館的定位與管理也因應而開始轉變。 |
|
課程目標 |
本課程以墾拓社會如美、加、澳、紐與台灣的博物館發展為主，討論其中博物館與原住民族在典藏物件上，觀念與相應作法的異同以及近年的折衝與轉變。 |
|
課程要求 |
上課方式：
上課前務必先閱讀指定的材料，上課時先由同學扼要報告，教師講課，之後討論。期中有一次博物館參訪，大學部同學需在參訪後提出參訪觀察。
評分方法：
讀書評論 20% (5% x 4)
博物館參訪觀察 10% (大學部)
報告 70% (大學部); 80% (研究所)
學期成績以報告為主，為讓報告順利開展，同學將逐步以四個主題完成讀書評論。若安排得當，將有助於學期報告。 |
|
預期每週課後學習時數 |
|
|
Office Hours |
每週三 12:00~14:00 |
|
指定閱讀 |
詳見課程進度 |
|
參考書目 |
詳見課程進度
原住民與博物館：變動的觀念、關係與實作
(Indigenous Peoples and Museums: Changing Concepts, Relationships and
Practices)
108學年秋季
童元昭
U
週三下午2:20-5:20
課程目標：一般來說，博物館是一個受歡迎的學習場所，但涉及原住民人體遺骸或物件典藏的民族
學或綜合性的博物館，則在全球原住民族意識漸強的時代面臨諸多批判挑戰。博物館的定位與管理
也因應而開始轉變。本課程以墾拓社會如，美、加、澳、紐與台灣的博物館發展為主，討論其中博
物館與原住民族在典藏物件上，觀念與相應作法的異同以及近年的折衝與轉變。
上課方式: 上課前務必先閱讀指定的材料，上課時先由同學扼要報告，教師講課，之後討論。期中
有一次自主的博物館參訪，大學部同學需在參訪後提出參訪觀察。
評分方法
讀書評論 20% (5% x 4)
博物館參訪觀察 10% (大學部)
報告 70% (大學部); 80% (研究所)
學期成績以報告為主，為讓報告順利開展，同學將逐步以四個主題完成讀書評論。若安排得當，將
有助於學期報告。
讀書評論：本課程期待選課學生可以掌握每一主題的重要性及相關的不同觀點，並能區別不同觀點
之論述。同學需完成四篇評論，內容可以有少部份的文章的扼要概述，但以議題的評論為主。字數
不超過1,500字。同學可從學期中的課堂閱讀材料挑選所關注的四個主題完成。繳交時間訂定為
(10/2, 10/23, 11/13, 12/18)，請上傳ceiba。每篇占5%，共20% 。
博物館參訪觀察：1,000字以內，限大學部。在課堂上口頭報告，約5-15分鐘。12/18上傳繳交書
面心得。參訪請自行安排。
報告：正文10頁。1/10/2020前繳交。體例參考考古人類學刊
第一周 9/11 課程簡介
Tung p. 2
第二周 9/18 博物館與原住民
Brown, M.
2003 Introduction. In Who owns native culture? pp. 1-10. Cambridge, MA:
Harvard University Press.
Thomas, Nicholas
2016 Ch. 3: The collection as Creative Technology in The Return of
Curiosity: What Museums are Good for in the 21st Century. Pp. 115-137. London:
Reaktion Books.
第三周 9/25 民族學標本採集與知識生產
胡家瑜
2006 〈博物館、人類學與台灣原住民展示：歷史過程中文化再現場域的轉形變化〉。《國立台
灣大學考古人類學刊》66: 94-124。
Kuper, Adam
1999 'Introduction: Culture Wars', in Culture: the anthropologists Account.
Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Handler, Richard
2003 Cultural Property and culture theory. Journal of Social Archaeology
3(3): 353 – 365.
*Gardner, Helen
2004 ‘Gathering for God: George Brown and the Christian Economy in the
Collection of Artefacts.’ In Hunting the Gatherers: Ethnographic Collectors,
Agents and Agency in Melanesia, 1870s-1930s. Oxford: Berghahn. Pp. 35-54.
*Hamilton, Michelle
2010 Collections and Objections: Aboriginal Material Culture in Southern
Ontario. Montreal, Kingston: McGill-Queen’s Press. Ch. 2, For the General Good
of Science: Historical and Scientific Society Museums
第四周 10/2 博物館展示、殖民治理與國家的原住民
李子寧
2005 〈從殖民收藏到文物回歸—百年來臺灣原住民文物收藏的回顧與反省〉。刊於《博物館.知
識建構與現代性：慶祝漢寶德館長七秩華誕學術研討會論文集》，王嵩山主編，頁23-36。台中：
國立自然科學博物館。
McCarthy, Conal
2007 Ch.1 Colonialism’s Culture, 1865-1913; & 2 Our Nation’s Story, 1912-42.
In Exhibiting Maori: A History of Colonial Cultures of Display. Pp. 13-99.
Oxford & New York: Berg.
繳交第一次書評
Tung p. 3
第五周 10/9 物的價值：文化權與智慧財產權，國際公約與法律的介入
Macpherson, C.B.
1978 Introduction. Property: Mainstream and Critical Positions.
University of Toronto Press.
Forsyth, Miranda
2012 Do You Want it Gift Wrapped?: Protecting Traditional Knowledge in the
Pacific Island Countries. In Indigenous Peoples’ Innovation: Intellectual
Property Pathways to Development, Peter Drahos and Susy Frankel (eds). Pp. 189-
214. Canberra: ANU E Press.
2013 The Developmental Ramifications of Vanuatu's Intellectual Property
Commitments on Joining the World Trade Organisation. Journal of Pacific Studies
36(1/2): 157-172.
第六周 10/16 物的價值：部落觀點
Hann, C.
1998 Introduction: The Embeddedness of Property. In Hann (ed.). Property
Relations.
Brown, Michael C.
1998 ‘Can Culture Be Copyrighted?’ in Current Anthropology 39(2): 193-223.
*Weiner, A.
1985 Inalienable Wealth, American Ethnologist, 12 (2): 210-227.
第七周 10/23 物的價值：物與記憶、歷史與情感
繳交第二次書評
Te Awekotuku, Ngahuia
2008 ‘Mata Oro: Chiseling the Living Face, Dimensions of Maori
Tattoo.’ In Sensible Objects: Colonialism, Museums and Material Culture, E
Edwards, C Gosden and R Phillips (eds), pp 121-140. Oxford: Berg.
Rhornton, Russell
2002 ‘Repatriation as healing the wounds of the trauma of history:
cases of
Native Americans in the United States of America.’ In The Dead and Their
Possessions: repatriation in principle, policy and practice (eds.) C. Fforde,
J. Hubert and P. Turnbull, pp. 17-24. New York, London: Routledge.
第八周 10/30 博物館與源出社群的新關係I: 觀念與挑戰 Tung p. 4
Edwards, Elizabeth
2003 Introduction. In Laura Peers & Alison K. Brown eds. Museums and Source
Communities: A Routledge Reader. Pp. 83-99. London: Routledge.
Clifford, James.
1997 “Museums as Contact Zones,” in Routes: Travel and Transformation in the
Late Twentieth Century, pp. 107-45. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Henare, Amiria
2004 “Rewriting the Script: Te Papa Tongarewa the Museum of New
Zealand.” In Social Analysis 48(1): 55-63.
Phillips, Ruth B
2005 ‘Re-placing Objects: Historical Practices for the Second Museum
Age.’ In The Canadian Historical Review 86(1): 83-110.
第九周 11/6 博物館與源出社群的新關係II: 返鄉特展
李子寧
2011《從「民族誌物件」到「文化資產」---台博館藏原住民文物「返鄉」意義的探討》，再訪接
觸地帶---記奇美原住民文物館與國立台灣博物館的「奇美文物回奇美」特展，台灣博物季刊30卷2
期第4頁至第13頁
吳明季
2011 物的力量---從「奇美文物回奇美」到「恢復失傳祭典儀式」，台灣博物季刊30
卷2期第14頁至第19頁
Clifford, James
2013 Ch.7 Second Life: The Return of the Masks. In Returns: Becoming
Indigenous in the Twenty-First Century. Pp. 261-314. Cambridge, Massachusetts:
Harvard University Press. (有中文譯本)
第十周 11/13 博物館與源出社群的新關係III: 做親戚
盧梅芬
2015 〈從展示文本邁向我群與他者的溝通─原住民文化再現的策展脈絡與反思〉。《博物館學
季刊》29(3): 5-35。
童元昭
2018 法律、親屬關係與祖靈：佳平的國寶歷程。宜蘭: 人類營宜蘭傳藝中心。2018
年8月28日。
Ames, Michael M.
2003 ‘How to decorate a house: the renegotiation of cultural
representations at the University of British Columbia Museum of Anthropology’
in Museums and Source Communities, L Peers and A Brown eds, pp 171-180. London:
Routledge.
繳交第三次書評
Tung p.5
第十一周 11/20 影像的典藏，展示與返還
Thomas, Nicholas
1992 Colonial conversion: Difference, Hierarchy, and History in Early-
twentieth Century Evangelical Propaganda. Comparative Studies in society and
History 34: 366-89.
Sasson, Joanna
2004 Photographic Materiality in the Age of Digital Reproduction, In
Elizabeth Edwards & Janice Hart eds. Photographs, Objects, Histories: on the
Materiality of Images. Pp. 186-202. London: Routledge.
Kim Christen’s Mukurtu Project. http://www.mukurtuarchive.org/
Geismar, H.
2009 Photography changes who gets to see images of us. Click! Photography
Changes Everything. http://click.si.edu/Story.aspx?story=530
第十二周 11/27 數位化的可能與再思考
Christen, Kimberly
2005 Gone Digital: Indigenous Re-mix and the Cultural Commons.
International Journal of Cultural Property 12:315-345.
Deidre Brown, Deidre & George Nicholas
2012 Protecting indigenous cultural property in the age of digital
democracy: Institutional and communal responses to Canadian First Nations and
Maori heritage concerns. Journal of Material Culture 17(3): 307-324
第十三周 12/4 人體遺骸返還
Krmpotich, Cara
2010 Remembering and Repatriation: the Production of Kinship, Memory and
Respect. Journal of Material Culture 15(2): 157-179.
Paterson, R. K.
2009 Ancestral remains in institutional collections: Proposals for reform.
In C. Bell & R.K. Paterson (Eds.), Protection of First Nations cultural
heritage: Laws, policy and reform, pp.155-180. Vancouver, BC: University of
British Columbia Press.
*Marine Bel, Michael Berger and Robert K. Paterson
Tung p. 6
2008 Administrative Tribunal of Rouen, Decision No. 702737 December 27, 2007
(Maori Head case). International Journal of Cultural Property , Volume 15 ,
Issue 02 , May 2008 , pp 223-226
*Herewini, Te Herekieki,
2008 The Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa (Te Papa) and the
Repatriation of Köiwi Tangata (Mäori and Moriori skeletal remains) and Toi Moko
(Mummified Maori Tattooed Heads). International Journal of Cultural
Property.15:405-406
請參考花蓮馬遠布農部落的例子。
影片 The Stolen Spirits of Haida. 2004 (1:19).
第十四周 12/11 文獻或文物: wampum帶的例子
Runde, Aileen
2010 ‘The Return of Wampum Belts: Ethical Issues and the Repatriation of
Native American Archival Materials.’ In Journal of Information Ethics 19(1):
33-44.
第十五周 12/18 從民族學博物館到民族博物館
繳交第四次書評
演講 Biung Ismahan先生
第十六周 12/25
Willis, E.
2008 The Law, Politics, and “Historical Wounds”: The Dja Dja Warrung
Bark Etchings Case in Australia, IJCP 2008 15:49–63
Jacobs, Jordan
2009 Repatriation and the reconstruction of identity. Museum
Anthropology. 32(2): 83 – 96
Lonetree, Amy
2008 Acknowledging the Truth of History: Missed opportunities at the
National Museum of the American Indian. In Amy Lonetree & Amanda J. Cobb eds.
The National Museum of the American Indian: Critical Conversations. Pp. 305-
327. Lincoln & London: University of Nebraska Press.
*Wakehan, Pauline
Tung p. 7
2008 Performing Reconciliation at the National Museum of the American
Indian: Postcolonial Rapprochement and the Politics of Historical Closure. In
Amy Lonetree & Amanda J. Cobb eds. The National Museum of the American Indian:
Critical Conversations. Pp. 353-383. Lincoln & London: University of Nebraska
Press.
第十七周 1/1 元旦放假
上課結束
|
|
評量方式
(僅供參考) |
|
No. |
項目 |
百分比 |
說明 |
|
1. |
期末報告 |
70% |
70% (大學部); 80% (研究所)。
正文10頁。1/10/2020前繳交。體例參考考古人類學刊。 |
2. |
博物館參訪觀察 |
10% |
1,000字以內，限大學部。11/13繳交。參訪自行安排。 |
3. |
讀書評論 |
20% |
本課程期待選課學生可以掌握每一主題的重要性及相關的不同觀點，並能區別不同觀點之論述。同學需完成四篇評論，內容可以有少部份的文章的扼要概述，但以議題的評論為主。字數不超過1,500字。同學可從學期中的課堂閱讀材料挑選所關注的四個主題完成。繳交時間訂定為(10/2, 10/23, 11/13, 12/18)，請上傳ceiba。每篇占5%，共20%。 |
|
|
週次 |
日期 |
單元主題 |
|
第1週 |
|
課程簡介 |
|
第2週 |
|
博物館與原住民
//
Brown, M.
2003 Introduction. In Who owns native culture? pp. 1-10. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Thomas, Nicholas
2016 Ch. 3: The collection as Creative Technology in The Return of Curiosity: What Museums are Good for in the 21st Century. Pp. 115-137. London: Reaktion Books. |
|
第3週 |
|
民族學標本採集與知識生產
//
胡家瑜
2006 〈博物館、人類學與台灣原住民展示：歷史過程中文化再現場域的轉形變化〉。《國立台灣大學考古人類學刊》66: 94-124。
Kuper, Adam
1999 'Introduction: Culture Wars', in Culture: the anthropologists Account. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Handler, Richard
2003 Cultural Property and culture theory. Journal of Social Archaeology 3(3): 353 – 365.
*Gardner, Helen
2004 ‘Gathering for God: George Brown and the Christian Economy in the Collection of Artefacts.’ In Hunting the Gatherers: Ethnographic Collectors, Agents and Agency in Melanesia, 1870s-1930s. Oxford: Berghahn. Pp. 35-54.
*Hamilton, Michelle
2010 Collections and Objections: Aboriginal Material Culture in Southern Ontario. Montreal, Kingston: McGill-Queen’s Press. Ch. 2, For the General Good of Science: Historical and Scientific Society Museums. |
|
第4週 |
10/02 |
博物館展示、殖民治理與國家的原住民
李子寧
2005 〈從殖民收藏到文物回歸—百年來臺灣原住民文物收藏的回顧與反省〉。刊於《博物館.知識建構與現代性：慶祝漢寶德館長七秩華誕學術研討會論文集》，王嵩山主編，頁23-36。台中：國立自然科學博物館。
McCarthy, Conal
2007 Ch.1 Colonialism’s Culture, 1865-1913; & 2 Our Nation’s Story, 1912-42. In Exhibiting Maori: A History of Colonial Cultures of Display. Pp. 13-99. Oxford & New York: Berg.
|
|
第5週 |
10/09 |
物的價值: 文化權與智慧財產權，國際公約與法律的介入 |
|
第6週 |
10/016 |
物的價值：部落觀點
Hann, C.
1998 Introduction: The Embeddedness of Property. In Hann (ed.). Property Relations.
Brown, Michael C.
1998 ‘Can Culture Be Copyrighted?’ in Current Anthropology 39(2): 193-223.
*Weiner, A.
1985 Inalienable Wealth, American Ethnologist, 12 (2): 210-227.
|
|
第7週 |
10/23 |
物的價值：物與記憶、歷史與情感
繳交第二次書評
Te Awekotuku, Ngahuia
2008 ‘Mata Oro: Chiseling the Living Face, Dimensions of Maori Tattoo.’ In Sensible Objects: Colonialism, Museums and Material Culture, E Edwards, C Gosden and R Phillips (eds), pp 121-140. Oxford: Berg.
Rhornton, Russell
2002 ‘Repatriation as healing the wounds of the trauma of history: cases of
Native Americans in the United States of America.’ In The Dead and Their Possessions: repatriation in principle, policy and practice (eds.) C. Fforde, J. Hubert and P. Turnbull, pp. 17-24. New York, London: Routledge.
|
|
第8週 |
|
博物館與源出社群的新關係I: 觀念與挑戰
Edwards, Elizabeth
2003 Introduction. In Laura Peers & Alison K. Brown eds. Museums and Source Communities: A Routledge Reader. Pp. 83-99. London: Routledge.
Clifford, James.
1997 “Museums as Contact Zones,” in Routes: Travel and Transformation in the Late Twentieth Century, pp. 107-45. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Henare, Amiria
2004 “Rewriting the Script: Te Papa Tongarewa the Museum of New Zealand.” In Social Analysis 48(1): 55-63.
Phillips, Ruth B
2005 ‘Re-placing Objects: Historical Practices for the Second Museum Age.’ In The Canadian Historical Review 86(1): 83-110.
|
|
第9週 |
11/06 |
博物館與源出社群的新關係II: 返鄉特展
李子寧
2011《從「民族誌物件」到「文化資產」---台博館藏原住民文物「返鄉」意義的探討》，再訪接觸地帶---記奇美原住民文物館與國立台灣博物館的「奇美文物回奇美」特展，台灣博物季刊30卷2期第4頁至第13頁
吳明季
2011 物的力量---從「奇美文物回奇美」到「恢復失傳祭典儀式」，台灣博物季刊30卷2期第14頁至第19頁
Clifford, James
2013 Ch.7 Second Life: The Return of the Masks. In Returns: Becoming Indigenous in the Twenty-First Century. Pp. 261-314. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. (有中文譯本)
|
|
第10週 |
11/13 |
博物館與源出社群的新關係III: 做親戚
繳交第三次書評
盧梅芬
2015 〈從展示文本邁向我群與他者的溝通─原住民文化再現的策展脈絡與反思〉。《博物館學季刊》29(3): 5-35。
童元昭
2018 法律、親屬關係與祖靈：佳平的國寶歷程。宜蘭: 人類營宜蘭傳藝中心。2018年8月28日。
Ames, Michael M.
2003 ‘How to decorate a house: the renegotiation of cultural representations at the University of British Columbia Museum of Anthropology’ in Museums and Source Communities, L Peers and A Brown eds, pp 171-180. London: Routledge.
|
|
第11週 |
11/20 |
影像的典藏，展示與返還
Thomas, Nicholas
1992 Colonial conversion: Difference, Hierarchy, and History in Early-twentieth Century Evangelical Propaganda. Comparative Studies in society and History 34: 366-89.
Sasson, Joanna
2004 Photographic Materiality in the Age of Digital Reproduction, In Elizabeth Edwards & Janice Hart eds. Photographs, Objects, Histories: on the Materiality of Images. Pp. 186-202. London: Routledge.
Kim Christen’s Mukurtu Project. http://www.mukurtuarchive.org/
Geismar, H.
2009 Photography changes who gets to see images of us. Click! Photography Changes Everything. http://click.si.edu/Story.aspx?story=530
|
|
第12週 |
11/27 |
數位化的可能與再思考
Christen, Kimberly
2005 Gone Digital: Indigenous Re-mix and the Cultural Commons. International Journal of Cultural Property 12:315-345.
Deidre Brown, Deidre & George Nicholas
2012 Protecting indigenous cultural property in the age of digital democracy: Institutional and communal responses to Canadian First Nations and Maori heritage concerns. Journal of Material Culture 17(3): 307-324
|
|
第13週 |
12/04 |
人體遺骸返還
Krmpotich, Cara
2010 Remembering and Repatriation: the Production of Kinship, Memory and Respect. Journal of Material Culture 15(2): 157-179.
Paterson, R. K.
2009 Ancestral remains in institutional collections: Proposals for reform. In C. Bell & R.K. Paterson (Eds.), Protection of First Nations cultural heritage: Laws, policy and reform, pp.155-180. Vancouver, BC: University of British Columbia Press.
*Marine Bel, Michael Berger and Robert K. Paterson Tung p. 6
2008 Administrative Tribunal of Rouen, Decision No. 702737 December 27, 2007 (Maori Head case). International Journal of Cultural Property , Volume 15 , Issue 02 , May 2008 , pp 223-226
*Herewini, Te Herekieki,
2008 The Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa (Te Papa) and the Repatriation of Köiwi Tangata (Mäori and Moriori skeletal remains) and Toi Moko (Mummified Maori Tattooed Heads). International Journal of Cultural Property.15:405-406
請參考花蓮馬遠布農部落的例子。
影片 The Stolen Spirits of Haida. 2004 (1:19).
|
|
第14週 |
12/11 |
文獻或文物: wampum帶的例子
Runde, Aileen
2010 ‘The Return of Wampum Belts: Ethical Issues and the Repatriation of Native American Archival Materials.’ In Journal of Information Ethics 19(1): 33-44.
|
|
第15週 |
12/18 |
從民族學博物館到民族博物館
繳交第四次書評
演講 Biung Ismahan先生
|
|
第16週 |
12/25 |
12/25
Willis, E.
2008 The Law, Politics, and “Historical Wounds”: The Dja Dja Warrung Bark Etchings Case in Australia, IJCP 2008 15:49–63
Jacobs, Jordan
2009 Repatriation and the reconstruction of identity. Museum Anthropology. 32(2): 83 – 96
Lonetree, Amy
2008 Acknowledging the Truth of History: Missed opportunities at the National Museum of the American Indian. In Amy Lonetree & Amanda J. Cobb eds. The National Museum of the American Indian: Critical Conversations. Pp. 305-327. Lincoln & London: University of Nebraska Press.
*Wakehan, Pauline Tung p. 7
2008 Performing Reconciliation at the National Museum of the American Indian: Postcolonial Rapprochement and the Politics of Historical Closure. In Amy Lonetree & Amanda J. Cobb eds. The National Museum of the American Indian: Critical Conversations. Pp. 353-383. Lincoln & London: University of Nebraska Press.
|
|
第17週 |
|
口頭報告 |
|